NEW STEP BY STEP MAP FOR SUREWIN FRAUD

New Step by Step Map For surewin fraud

New Step by Step Map For surewin fraud

Blog Article

156 Contrary to the Ong brothers, Ken and Sally did not go missing For some time; they stayed in Singapore and defended the suits versus them.

Why are ken and sally accused? It truly is given that they now gain about fifty million Singapore pounds With this venture Now they don't want to spit out the money, so everyone seems to be forcing them to catch them and return the money to us.

five. On or all over early Could 2014, one met up with Sandra in Hong Kong. She advised me that she had just returned from her vacation to Singapore, in which she attended a convention organised by SureWin4U, which was an expenditure scheme she was taking part in.

Withdrawal Denials: Following profitable, players come across their withdrawal requests delayed or denied devoid of explanation.

(a) In perspective with the Scheme’s unorthodox modus operandi, it had been reasonably foreseeable that Sandra would depend on their own representation from the Plan’s protection and profitability.

The SOC will not mention Philip Ong, but her closing submissions incorporate him like a conspirator – this is simply not a satisfactory strategy for putting forward a conspiracy claim.

He extra that the missing messages might be interpreted in various means and the court should not come up with a “damning inference” with regard to the pair. /TISG

Remember, if it sounds too superior for being legitimate, it almost certainly is. Stay knowledgeable and defend by yourself from turning into a target from the SureWin rip-off.

40 For now, I simply observe that the focus of Sandra’s misrepresentation statements was greatly on Ken and Sally.

191 In essence, Sandra is saying that if Ken, Sally, and Sebastian were not fraudulent (and so they did not recognize that SureWin4U was a Ponzi plan), they were Yet negligent for not figuring out that SureWin4U was a Ponzi scheme, click here and she could sue them for that (While she also did not work out that SureWin4U was a Ponzi plan).

195 If Sandra did get previous the brink issue, there remains no requisite proximity concerning the closeness, and directness of the relationship among the parties, in relation to the very first phase inquiry inside the Spandeck framework. In almost any function, at the 2nd phase inquiry, plan concerns would militate from imposing a obligation of treatment on a complete course of folks (SureWin4U participants) in relation to exactly the same class of folks, to consider take care of one another (in relation to finding out – according to widespread facts – that each of these was becoming defrauded by a scheme they were all taking part in).

48 Sandra’s case is not a lot that Ken and Sally utilized the text “safe” and “lucrative” but that this was a continuing topic in Ken and Sally’s description of SureWin4U.

a hundred and eighty Sandra’s alternative claim for lawful indicates conspiracy won't help her. For this kind of assert, she would wish to point out (as she pleads in para 77 from the SOC) that “the predominant intent from the Defendants was to injure the Plaintiff”.

(file) Sandra’s perform while in the aftermath of SureWin4U’s collapse is inconsistent along with her case that she had invested as a consequence of false representations built to her by Ken, Sally, or Sebastian.

Report this page